Voting AGAINST candidates for the AC.

So, let's say I'm a newbie, I don't know anything, I lose the game to you, and only then do I realize that there was no way through. But I could have done something differently... so I turn to the judge and ask, what was wrong with my actions?

According to this logic, after losing, I can go into the map and look for bugs: somewhere a zone is flooded, somewhere there's no passage, I didn't reach it, but what if... what if the opponent's computer would have lagged in that zone, what if that zone existed and I would have played differently. Rematch! ... utter nonsense. What will be wrong in your actions is that during the game you were not able to assess the generated map. Iamsamstan didn't even fully explore his zone. And what if he had won the game? Could the opponent have asked for a restart because the map generation was buggy? For example, arguing that he didn't find a way to the opponent's secondary base, through which he could have killed him. Yes, during the game I didn't notice that there was no passage to the opponent's secondary base, only after looking at the map, but what if there was a teleport there and I would have caught it, instead of losing in the console on the way further...