Voting AGAINST candidates for the AC.

Well, why do you need politics in the tribunal? In my opinion, here are the people I voted for, 7 people. I would leave three of them: Pit, Dirty, and злой_романтик, and I just listed the rest. These people generally know the answers to questions about the game, they have been on the forum for a long time, and I accept their decisions because, in my opinion, they judge objectively.
As for those I voted against, firstly, the absence of an "abstain" button. Many candidates registered on the forum slightly earlier than me, and some even later. Again, a good player does not necessarily mean a good judge or organizer.
And about the celebrities, I voted against Vikka because he is in favor of politics on the portal and all sorts of discussions. I believe that the Administration Council discusses things among themselves and makes a decision, like a jury. I voted against Vigo because he was banned from the forum. I voted against RedWhite, well, he sometimes has outbursts, which is not good. I should have also voted against Stinger, if possible, remove my vote for him, because he probably doesn't have time for this. And Rebelius, I personally have no questions for him, but again, he becomes a participant in controversial situations, as does Cobra, although I have communicated with both of them, and I only have positive emotions from the communication. Sanin, I encountered him in a tournament, he is too pedantic, although he allows for a "fluctuation" of the rules in his favor. I won't give an example, if necessary, I'll tell you in ICQ. The Administration Council is the face of the forum, not a gang of quarrelers with green or pink nicknames.