Let me explain in another way. In Heroes, you can win without any contact with your opponent. A player who has no road to the GO on a Jebus Cross can achieve victory without ever knowing about the lack of that road. And their opponent will have no opportunity to moan for a replay. The same goes for that game with Sam: if I had thrown and surrendered, there would have been no talk of any replay; he would have calmly secured his win despite the bug. Allowing replayed bugged setups after a loss is a one-sided game, favoring the one who has the bug.

Hold on, first of all, the game ended on 121, when I broke through the monolith and came to your secondary I think, it was on that GO that I lost; secondly, I would have confirmed the report either way; my rating clearly shows I'm not particularly concerned about whether I win or not, and it's really a shame that Cobra called me a moaner, thanks to him for that; thirdly, there was a huge grassy respawn, so I didn't scout it in 1 week, the template was 2sm2s; later, after I opened the game afterwards, I saw there was no passage, and so I asked if a replay was possible in this case; you wrote that it was LOL whatever, and on that we settled it; I showed the save to Pit, he said the lack of passage had an influence, but the game could no longer be replayed; however, since there was a free slot in the lower bracket, he and Kalababa placed me there; that's the whole situation. But in our dialogue, you mentioned that you look at everything according to the rules, and according to the rules, there is no humanitarian restart, so there is a discrepancy, if we're talking about the game with Palach. But this is purely my opinion; the topic was created to discuss the pros and cons; I wrote it; I myself don't get involved in AC, so why discuss me here?