Voting AGAINST candidates for the AC.

are you pretending or what?
IF THE SUSPICION AROSE AFTER THE GAME, and considering that we're discussing m200, where you can't be distracted by anything at all for even a second, n.k. What does during the game or after have to do with it, another matter is that it's on the player's conscience (like if he saw it during the game, lost, and then pretends he didn't see it until the end of the game)

I get the feeling you're pretending. Not noticing the absence of a passage on any m200 template within the first week is pretty hard. In that game in question, the surrender happened somewhere in the middle of the second week. What do you mean the suspicion arose after the game? Let's imagine a Jebus Cross is being played, where the player has no road to GO, but he didn't scout it. On day five, for example, the player throws and surrenders, and after the game it turns out he had no road to GO. But if the player surrendered, then there can be no talk of any technical restarts. He could have kept playing after the throw, discovered the absence of a road to GO, and then legitimately taken a technical restart. Don't want to waste time - make a save and send it to the judge, let him check whether you have a road to GO. But if you've already admitted defeat, then what technical restarts? And by the way, the m200 rules have no technical restart for missing passages, and it doesn't generate all that rarely anyway.

this is the phrase I was commenting on "By registering for an official tournament, a player automatically agrees that he understands the templates installed for the tournament and the tournament rules."
based on it, if people know things that well, judges won't be needed, need more comments?:cool:

Actually, ideally that's how it should be. Players know the rules, the judge only intervenes when the situation is ambiguously interpreted by the rules, or if one of the players has suspicions regarding the legitimacy of the second player's actions, and also for consultation on any related matters. By the way, in three years on ХВ, I've never turned to judges, except for a couple of cases when opponents disappeared.
What you write about rules and judges looks funny, I can just picture chess players sitting down to play and one of them doesn't know the rules of the game. That's not his opponent's problem, and not the judge's problem, it's only that player's problem.