Voting AGAINST candidates for the AC.

1. If, during the game, there is a suspicion that a bug occurred, save the game and contact the tournament judge.
2. If players do not finish the game within the allotted time, save the game and make a decision.
3. Assigning an odd-even draw.
4. Resolving issues regarding players violating the rules during the game.
At least, that's the first thing that comes to mind.

Are you pretending or what?
IF THE SUSPICION AROSE AFTER THE GAME, and considering that we are discussing M200, where you can't be distracted for even a second, what does it matter whether it's during or after the game? It's a different matter that it's up to the player's conscience (like if he saw it during the game, lost, and then pretends he didn't see it until the end of the game).

Added 1 minute ago

Tell us, why do you think rules are needed?

to sanin
This is the phrase I was commenting on: "By registering for an official tournament, a player automatically agrees that they understand the templates used in the tournament and the tournament rules."
Judging by this, if people understand it so well, judges won't be needed, do I need to add anything else?:cool: