Voting AGAINST candidates for the AC.

This is a kind of humor; he would probably moderate better when drunk, paying less attention. But essentially, the moderators' work depends on the coordinator's policy; it doesn't matter who you choose. Romantic said this until Dirty, with his political views, started appearing in the forum.

But why do you need politics in the forum? In my opinion, here are the people I voted for, seven in total. I would have kept three of them: Pit, Dirty, and zloy_romantik; the rest were just added to the list. These people usually know the answers to questions about the game; they have been on the forum for a long time, and I accept their decisions because, in my opinion, they judge objectively.
As for those I voted against, firstly, the lack of an "abstain" button. Many candidates registered on the forum shortly before or even after me. Again, a good player doesn't necessarily make a good judge or organizer.
And about the celebrities, I voted against Vikka because he is in favor of politics on the portal and various discussions. I believe that the Arbitration Committee (AK) should deliberate and make decisions on their own, like a jury. I voted against Vigo because he was banned from the forum altogether. I voted against RedWhite because he sometimes has outbursts, which is not good. I should have also voted against Stinger; if possible, remove my vote for him because he probably doesn't have time for this. And Rebelius, I personally have no issues with him, but he also gets involved in controversial situations, as does Cobra, although I have only had positive interactions with both of them. Sanin, I encountered him in a tournament; he is too pedantic, although he allows for "flexibility" in the rules when it benefits him. I won't give an example, but I can tell you about it in ICQ if you want. The AK is the face of the forum, not a gang of quarrelers with green or pink nicknames.