Skip to content
#103
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;82038

Our entire world is a world of consumption that doesn't care about the future. And if it becomes necessary to destroy 5,900,000,000 people so that the remaining people can survive, is that good or evil?
To blow up the world to save it...
Yeah, another case of arbitrary assignment to "villains" and "saints." Specifically (personally for me), it's impossible to prove that someone who destroys so many people is right or wrong. On one hand, they will destroy a great many people, but on the other hand, they will save all of humanity. The goal is global and aimed at a "good" purpose. Some may think that option number 2 is better and more humane, but let's look at it from another angle. Perhaps you will destroy useful people and leave behind lazy people and criminals. Do you really want that kind of new world? I want to say that in such complex situations, it is very difficult to decide, and it is impossible to put everything in order: "this is a good deed," "this is a bad deed."

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil

Users Online 3 users 1057 guests