Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
To be precise, it's an OVERDOSE. Tarkovsky's philosophy is cloying and completely artificial, unlike the subtle approach of the Strugatsky brothers.
Not entirely correct, but the general idea is right.
I've watched Stalker and Solaris (even rewatched them), and I've read Strugatsky and Lem. And I can definitely say that I don't like Tarkovsky's adaptations. He may be a genius, but first and foremost, he's a schizophrenic, and I don't like his view of the works and of life in general (which can be judged by his films, because he undoubtedly put a lot of himself into them). Although, for general knowledge, it's worth watching, as it's a part of film history.
Well, that's harsh. The fact that he put a lot of himself into the film is not necessarily a bad thing, but his view of life also doesn't appeal to me. It's worth watching to get into a philosophical mood or for general development.
Watch good movies! Watch movies for the mind! Watch beautiful movies! Watch the films of Andrei Tarkovsky!