Restructuring of the Academy.

Going forward, if we change the concept according to the existing vector, then opposition is needed within the AC. All the arguments will move there, at least in their initial phase, after the decision is made and a list is published showing how everyone voted, so that all "supporters" and those who are dissatisfied will understand who to be indignant with and who to admire. In this case, people like Vikk, Rebe, Sanin would look good as opposition within the AC; the main thing is that this doesn't turn into a situation where everyone is pulling in different directions. Considering that Dirty was the informal head of the opposition, that's already 4 people, and the opposition should be in the minority.

I don't think it makes sense to talk about some kind of opposition. The AC is not a political party, and the so-called opposition is also not united by any principles, except perhaps one – criticism. These are people who care and who, as we can see, are not against moving from criticism to action.
But the conservative part of the forum seems to see some kind of opposition, which is confirmed by your post and the lists of Romantic/Sam/Scorpio/Darka, where there are mostly people who supported the AC and, for some reason, Tvarin, who doesn't seem to be involved in any activity in related discussions. And Nitro is a candidate who is convenient for everyone (I'm also for him).
As for the reformist lobby, at least these guys. The worst thing would be if none of those who criticized or suggested something new get into the AC. We replace people, but the stagnation remains.

Pit is currently like the Queen of Great Britain; he doesn't make decisions, but no one can take a step without his advice.

It would be good if Pit shared his vision of the situation and his plans for further participation in the forum's life.

It's not the truth, but a circus where everyone is trying to take the lead! When views are radically different from the general opinion, they still won't agree!

A general opinion is reached through a vote with an odd number of voters. And radically different views are, in any case, closer to the truth than a situation where there are no alternative points of view in a collegial body.