Good and evil.

Are you referring to Jesus as a biblical figure? As the son of God and one of his hypostases? God is a Trinity, and Jesus is part of this Trinity. He is not just a biblical "character," but a historical figure and the Son of God – how can he not be considered as such? Just don't impose your own meaning on the Bible if you haven't even studied it properly.

Again, who told you that? The Scripture? Well, you can write anything you want. I don't deny that Jesus was a historical figure. But we don't know, and will never know, who he really was. And the idea of the "Son of God" is not new; it was simply localized, stating that there is only ONE Son of God, and all the others are slaves. They simply took a pagan idea and adapted it to their own needs. Frankly, I don't want to get into a debate about this, as it would take up too much space.
We have been deliberately cut off from the original source, and they present their own interpretation, which is essentially paganism, because almost everything, except for the story of the creation of the world, is taken from paganism (worship, attributes, priesthood, holidays, etc.), only instead of gods, there are prophets, saints, the Virgin Mary, the Son of God, etc. All of this exists and has existed in paganism for centuries, only it is called differently, or even the same (Virgin Mary). The Jewish leaders, starting with Moses, decided to oppose paganism with their own religion, which they created, but which has not reached us, as it was lost during the Babylonian captivity. Therefore, the creator of the surviving version, and even that is doubtful, is Ezra, not even Moses. And even then, the Jews themselves kept the Talmud (a refined version of the Old Testament), while the current Bible is already a "refined" book by Christian ideologists, which constantly mentions the Messiah, who must save mankind, and that he is the Son of God, and even God himself. By the way, there is not a word about the Trinity in the Bible in a dogmatic sense. This was invented no earlier than the fourth century by the Church Fathers, followers of Plato. You won't even find a mention of the Trinity in the New Testament, let alone the Virgin Mary and saints in their current understanding. All these teachings are the result of philosophical speculation, which essentially has no confirmation even in the Scripture that you like to refer to.

I apologize for the off-topic.