Дегустация Horn of the Abyss

2The: p.s. Overall, the post gave me the same feeling as Heroina and Co's posts about the game mechanics overhaul. People are drawing conclusions based on assumptions rather than on the experience of specific games. It's not cool, and in my opinion, it's worse than just mindless chatter.

I'm incredibly interested in your gameplay in HotA, which you use to accuse me of making assumptions and so on.
Overhaul, overhaul, overhaul, let's weave it into all topics and consider it the ultimate, irrefutable argument for your point of view.

2The:
1. Actually, having Lore with a guaranteed 3 stacks is NOT demoralizing and NOT a weak start. Yes, the Miner is significantly weaker. But 25+ griffin guards is not demoralizing; it's a separate strategy that can be very effective, especially against hordes of golems/earth elementals, etc.

Here's the true essence of the Warlord Tower strategy in all its glory. What you described is situational, meaning it's rarely used. Although in Warlord Tower, there was still experience gained from these griffins, and they were effective. I just don't understand how you got 25+ griffins (or rather, I do understand; you meant that Lore is taken as a starting unit, plus the main hero + a purchased unit, with maximum stacks, as in Warlord Tower). I'm amazed that hardcore Warlord Tower players manage to turn any topic into a discussion about their Warlord Tower. Are you afraid that you'll fade into obscurity if you don't make such posts periodically? Well, it's your business, not mine to judge.

2The:

2. A Necromancer without stacks is totally weak at the start. Plus, skeletons accumulate very slowly due to the reduced Necromancy skill. Saying that having an "imba" stack at levels 121-122 is a bit naive...

This image speaks a thousand words.

p.s. The post was written from an entertaining point of view, sometimes prompting reflection, using exaggerations and allegories, sometimes very obvious. (about the previous post)
In essence, you wrote the first point, but only formally; in practice, it's not true.
The second point is a matter of taste. Although it seems to me that most people understand it the same way I do, or maybe not; that's fine. In general, I could have just answered like that, but after your "p.s." the essence of the answer can only be the picture above.