Any significant changes to the rules are made by voting. And everyone who wants to can vote, as far as I remember. When did we start having "chosen ones" whose vote should carry more weight?
No one can stop you from creating a checkbox. It's your personal business. Conducting your own tournaments, if you decide to take it on, is also not prohibited. The main thing is that there are organizers and people who want to participate, and there will definitely be plenty of them.
But please, don't decide for everyone what and how things should be in official tournaments.
Great, well, let's create some clones now and hold a vote so that IT IS EXACTLY what YOU like. ))))
Each host DECIDES FOR HIMSELF according to what rules his tournament will be played. We have a democracy - you can sign up if you want, or you can not. I sign up for everything.)
Added 5 minutes ago
The same as above, create a checkbox, create your own tournaments. In a year, create a vote. If people are drawn to the changes, that's good, if not, that's also good, time will tell. But there is no need to divide the votes into "chosen ones" whose votes are counted, and "just some random people" whose votes are not counted. There is no need to divide the players into two categories, we are all playing the same game.
I agree, we shouldn't, but I wasn't the first to start publishing lists.))
What I don't want most of all is for any kind of Schism to occur, which is why I suggest we come to a peaceful agreement, but my opponents don't listen to me :smile32:

