Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
to IronAxe: well, what else can I say... read more carefully... :D I think I expressed myself clearly...
No, this line is unclear to me, and the formula is too complicated – I don't really want to delve into it. BUT, based on the results in the table in the "HOW IT BECAME" column, I like it more than a simple oscillator, and with the bonus and a 5-unit threshold. By the way, when I was arguing with AmberSoler, I told him that if he came up with something that would make the transition from the first column to the second smoother, so that the second component wouldn't suppress the first as much in our formulas as it did in his version. But we didn't go any further. If you really like complicated formulas and taking up space into account, I would agree that the main official rating should be calculated using the system that Kyle has now proposed. I will leave my system as an alternative – it shows the rating purely based on speed and does not take into account any secondary factors (buffs, mercury), and therefore does not take into account the space occupied. If AlexPank wants to keep both systems, I'm not against it. But sooner or later, the underdogs will catch up with him and beat him :) For the bonus. Just kidding :) Let's have a chess federation! ;)