Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.
Kyle;81557to IronAxe: You clearly misunderstood me... I meant that this figure will be the minimum in the second column... i.e., in the second column, the figures will be from 100(leader) > X(n-th player) > the outsider's figure from the first column... Anyway, to make it clear, I'll make a table and post it in this thread... and we'll see from there... :D Regards.I don't know how I understood you, but the situations described in the previous post are real under the layout you are proposing. When using the oscillator, you will find that the player in second-to-last place in the rating ends up lower than the player in last place. After all, are you suggesting that only the player in last place transfers their rating from the first column to the second ?? If you make tables - also check the option where the rating in the first column for the second-to-last person differs from the rating in the first column for the last person by approximately 0.5.