Skip to content

Which came first: matter or spirit?

User Avatar
#69
Auto-translated
Berserker;81409

Here is what you are doing: you contemptuously say, "religion is superstition," but you don't have anywhere near enough scientific facts and evidence for such a statement! You are violating your own principle, which means you are descending to the same level as we are. You BELIEVE and we BELIEVE. You have no proof and neither do we. Or rather, they exist (for both), but it is an area of dispute.
"I meant living matter."
You have no facts, we have almost none, except for one: nobody has seen this, therefore it can be assumed that it does not exist. And I mentioned "possessing" etc., in order to more effectively prove my idea. I am trying both to prove my own and to refute others'.
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.