Actaea

In short, think it over seriously. Do you need this (NS will no longer be taken into account), will you play, will you be ready to accept the game mechanics (or rather, parameters) that I prepare, will you be ready not to "get upset" when something goes wrong, will you be ready not to get upset about lost battles if it comes to that (I will conduct the battle calculation in a similar way to Expeditions).

I'll be honest. I don't find this idea appealing.
1) I don't want to belittle Revan's efforts, his creativity, and his ability to develop characters, but I don't see any guarantees that the game will be balanced. Because all the numbers (except the starting ones) are written "from the top of my head."
2) The expansion is also "from the top of my head," but I want to play any expansion, even if it's a thousand times unbalanced, because it's cooperative. If we get our butts kicked because the opponent was too strong, then we'll all get our butts kicked, and that will even be fun.

In general, I apologize, but I am "not ready to accept the game mechanics (or rather, the parameters) that Revan prepares." I will wait for the expansion.

The most logical option in this situation would be to exclude this country from the game altogether and leave it at the level of a bot that does not participate in game actions, but I really don't like this option.

You can play as Greywater in this project if you want.

Full version, the GM is accused of poor distribution of properties and parameters

Yeah, yeah. And not even intentionally, because I believe that you sincerely want to distribute them well.