Good and evil.

Ganymed, I wouldn't risk interpreting the Bible in that way without reading it thoroughly four times and analyzing it in detail. Quote: "because it is known that he painted an ordinary picture, and then took and covered it with the famous black square." I don't know where you got this information. The so-called Malevich painted many pictures... hmm... of absolutely idiotic content, something that a sane person would never come up with. However, maybe he first drew three black triangles and then covered everything with black paint :) Here, religion is so often mixed with the concepts of Good and Evil that I don't quite understand where everyone gets such an opinion. The Bible does not give the concept of Evil, but it quite clearly gives the concept of Sin as a disease that has afflicted humanity. The essence of Sin lies primarily in "...the unwillingness of a person to recognize someone as their Creator, to recognize that we cannot do everything we want, to recognize that there are laws of the Creator...". We are ready to believe and come to terms with abstract power. Knowing that there is a director of a company somewhere is one thing. Directly obeying the orders of another person (even the same director or manager), who is alive and (in your opinion) no better than you - that is something else. Sometimes the power is abstract, sometimes it is real. You want to say, "I am the God and Master of my own destiny." And you are told: "Wait, you are a creation, and you have a Creator who has rights over you." So, gentlemen, the basis of sin according to the Bible is "the unwillingness of a person to recognize and submit. <> And you will be like Gods, knowing Good and Evil." Thus, any sin is Evil. Everything that is not sin is not evil. This is according to religion. From this, one can logically derive the concept of Good, as well as a neutral act. I note that it is not worth mixing Good with the favorable (or vice versa) consequences of an action. These are completely different things. So, a neutral act can be determined by anyone. It does not contain anything. Like when we eat, go to work, and so on. Then Good will be determined by everything else, since, according to the Bible, any deed/action can be attributed to Good/Neutral/Evil. An action is determined by its nature and is in itself local. Those who begin to add a global meaning to it are simply trying to mislead. It is almost the same as comparing computer bits (0 or 1) with the number one thousand or more. Locally, it can be either 0 (Evil) or 1 (Good) (in our case, also neutral). 0 is the minimum, 1 is the maximum. And this is an absolute (on a local scale). It reminds me of humanism ("man is the measure of all things") and those who say that man is just an organism that, within the framework of the planet Earth, is a dangerous virus that destroys nature and the environment. Quote: "In my opinion, Good and Evil are just a figment of worldviews in relation to the world... And everything comes only from the perception of actions and things..." Gentlemen, do you even realize what you are writing about? I get the impression that your worldview is spontaneous and has nothing to do with reason. If I kill your mother, rape your sister, spit in your face, and sincerely believe that this is Good, will that be good????? Will you shrug your shoulders and philosophically say: "Good and Evil are just a figment of worldviews in relation to the world... And everything comes only from the perception of actions and things..."??? Change your perception, gentlemen, while there is still time. P.S. Remember Raskolnikov from Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment." "Am I a trembling creature, or do I have the right?" (to kill an innocent) And in the end, he confesses under the weight of the burden.