Skip to content
User Avatar
#186
Auto-translated
=Lizard=
Hundreds of games on the test server have shown that the timer isn't a reliable indicator here. A timer that's set too low often benefits less skilled players because they play using simpler, default strategies. A more skilled player might be able to (and need to) devise a complex plan on the test server, taking into account 8-10 heroes and numerous small battles on different fronts with different troops, but a low timer won't allow them to implement this physically. And then they have to play according to a simpler plan, which, in my opinion, unfairly equalizes the chances. So, the timer should simply be optimally calibrated for each specific template. This is why different standards have emerged for Jebus and HL+U, for example.
Absolutely! :smile54:
"Одержать сто побед в ста битвах — это не вершина воинского искусства. Повергнуть врага без сражения — вот вершина.
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."