Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
From my point of view, if a country that is among the economic leaders, leaders in production, etc., has "savages with sticks" in its government, and the prime minister makes a statement in the spirit of "hehe, lol," then that is not normal. They have nuclear weapons. Okay. What prevents them from taking and using them (assuming that Kittypink does not control their army entirely, but then that would mean that Kittypink is simply holding this country at gunpoint, which is also incorrect)? Like, "hehe, we weren't invited to the security council, let's shoot at them!" Corporations won't allow it? That's not a valid argument.