Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I may be wrong, but from my non-scientific point of view, many studies in the field of, for example, studying animal behavior in their natural environment do not really contribute to technologies that are relevant to humanity.
We need to define what is "relevant to humanity." Because if you ask humanity, the most relevant thing for it is the iPhone. Colonization and any other effective use of space are still far from us, which means this is not a "relevant to humanity" study. However, if we all reasoned this way, we would still be living in the Dark Ages, and if we start reasoning this way now, we will never be able to develop to the level of the Imperium and burn the damned xenos.
Again, I may be wrong, but regarding taxes, I have already said - it is better that no one flies into space and every year they release iPhones and back scratchers, than all people around live on ration cards.
It is immediately clear that this is a person from Europe...
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?