Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Gentlemen, please excuse my interruption, but as a spectator, I have something to say.

and no actions from the opponent could prevent this anymore
the game implies competition, until the very end, until the game objective, equivalent to the victory of one of the sides, is achieved, or someone surrenders
but where was the competition?
and since there was no game, there is no point in talking about the result

Correct words.

So, red kills blue in the castle on turn 111. In fact, there was no competition (game), and no actions from the opponent could prevent this. Blue is obliged to take a restart. In fact, it turns out that two players start the game, and one says: "Listen, buddy, let me have three restarts, and you have two." Is that what they call fair play?

he got an impenetrable block on the draw, he saw it and doesn't want to waste his and the other player's time! but here, the block came and broke it itself :smile16:

Not quite the same situation. When a player gets a block, it doesn't necessarily mean that he lost without a game. At least because the opponent may draw another block at the same time. The player can play out any scenario, especially with 160% luck. But in the case of the kill on turn 111, the opponent takes away his opportunity to play.