Well, because if the decision was made based on a comment to clause 2.13, that's strange, but okay, but if it was made based on the Fair Play rule, then the question is no longer about a rematch, but about more severe measures.

I myself am surprised by the relative leniency of the verdict.
But, apparently, this is due to the precedent when there was nothing at all for similar antics.
At the same time, it was unacceptable to forgive, so the Arbitration Committee tried as much as possible to find a middle ground.
And, considering that at the time of the performance of the song "I will kill you, Ferryman," the positions were approximately equal, a rematch is a rather wise decision, which could not be said about awarding the game.
The discount for Reddit is understandable from a human point of view - I don't argue at all with the idea that he is a "good guy," etc., and in the heat of the game, anything is possible :o. However, you always need to keep an eye on yourself, but we are all capable of making mistakes, especially when we really want something - in this case, you might not even notice the criminality in your actions.
The main thing is their awareness and categorical prevention in the future :cool: