Skip to content

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

User Avatar
#1072
Auto-translated
Piterius

I like the numerous expert opinions that, formally, the rules haven't been violated, but again, these are just subjective opinions. They've watched too many American movies about courts and lawyers, and now everyone thinks they're a successful lawyer, but has even a tenth of them even glanced at the civil code? Not every lawyer can explain the rule of law, the hierarchy of laws and regulations, the principles of how norms work, the difference between notes, recommendations, and explanations, but all the striking forum users definitely know that a note is no more important than the rules and have definitely determined which of the rules has the highest authority. Well, never mind, it's not that important anymore. If you think so, then think so.

=

I want to summarize:
1) The Administration Committee wrote the rules for all players in the community, but they have the right to make decisions regardless of their rules. After all, the rules are supposedly written with common sense in mind.
2) All decisions of the Administration Committee are not subject to discussion, because the Administration Committee is the most respected and wise people in the community.
Have I understood everything correctly? If not, please write down the ultimate truth, and I won't have any more questions.
twitch.tv/hiwanna