First, he asks not to engage in demagoguery, and then he writes lengthy posts about the loss of moral values in the younger generation.
This is another case of "25 again." I wasn't talking about a loss, but about a gradual erosion. I don't understand what else I need to explain to you. You've made up your own mind.
Do you think that comments on the rules carry more weight than the rules themselves?
You drew that conclusion yourself.
Or are we going to interpret these rules depending on the situation?
You drew that conclusion based on your own previous conclusion.
How does this dismissive attitude towards common rules for everyone relate to high moral qualities?
And he presented it on behalf of the group.
We still have to play by these rules, and we would like the understanding of the rules to be the same for ordinary players and representatives of the administration.
And to that
Well, what else is left besides subjective opinions?
All that remains is to suggest again not to give them too much weight. And especially not to present them as universal.
What made you think that the replay was scheduled because of a fairly won game?
I'm already lost in your assumptions; please excuse me from this.
icq: 407907277
skype: piterius_i