Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Firstly, regarding your post – I completely don't understand what football, a hand, doping, war, etc., have to do with it. Should we now start comparing the rules of bowling or checkers? Zero level of constructive discussion and comparative demagoguery is permissible, but there's simply nothing to talk about. Out of respect for you, I simply remained silent then. Secondly, I didn't accuse anyone of stupidity; why did you think that, and what does that imply? We'll leave that without comment. Just as I didn't allow myself to use phrases like "nonsense." Thirdly, I'm not putting pressure on anyone; I'm responding to remarks, often provocative ones. When someone repeats for the umpteenth time that morality is nonsense, Redwait won, and the rules weren't broken... it's just not interesting anymore. When there's something to talk about, why not? That is, what you consider to be taken out of context, I consider to be a continuation of the main topic that is being discussed. Everything else written by Timur is mainly either a repetition or an interpretation of what has already been said.