Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Well, Pete... And I'm not completely off base, and Timur explained quite clearly why it's wrong to take his most complex philosophical statement out of context. This phrase, which you highlighted in bold, is far from being the most important. We've gathered here, and we're not all completely clueless; we're not playing Counter-Strike, everyone understands each other's opinions. And most importantly, we respect these opinions. If a decision has been made by the Arbitration Committee, it's been made, and that's why the Arbitration Committee was created. But there's no need to pressure the fact that opinions that contradict the decision are "wrong" or "off base." To some extent, everyone who spoke here is right. They simply focused on different aspects of the matter. The topic is likely exhausted. Redwait won, and anything further has no bearing on this, but only on the future, where Redwait might not win in a similar situation. It's that simple.