Sanin
Auto-translated
I don't understand why you decided that the position of individual members of the Arbitration Committee, whether as judges or simply as players, represents the position of the entire Arbitration Committee?
I don't understand why you decided that the Arbitration Committee should act only in the cases when you think it's necessary?
I don't understand, when you wrote all those words, did you prepare a mechanism or tool that will now explain to everyone that the notes to the rules have any less weight than the rules themselves?
Is it written anywhere that the notes are for people to either ignore or look at as they please, or to look at only when something needs to be interpreted?
I now realize that I am starting to engage in nitpicking and basic legal skills, because there is no other way to explain it to someone who is so stubborn. He himself writes that something is stupid (thankfully it was banned), but he still argues for it because it is not written the way he wants... This is just insane...
I wrote a lot because you said you wanted to understand. As can be seen from your answer, you don't want to understand. I will try to formulate it very briefly: rules and regulations should be above the opinions of individual people. And judging should be based on the letter of the rules, not on common sense (common sense should be the basis of the rules themselves).
ICQ 423164784