Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

You keep repeating the same thing; it's been said a hundred times. Most people aren't against banning speed-hacking (SH) and the bug associated with it. The question is about THIS specific situation: is it okay for one person but not for another? If Reddit had used SH first, everyone would agree, but since others used it before, and there were no issues, that's what's causing the uproar among those you're trying to criticize.

There were no issues because there were no appeals to the Arbitration Committee (AK). This has already been said at least three times. If it was "swept under the rug" under certain circumstances in the past, that's no longer the case.
Regarding the "said a hundred times" part, either quote 100 posts here, thereby correcting your "blabbermouth" status, or adjust your post according to specific statistics.
And also, I'm not TRYING to criticize anyone; I've ALREADY criticized them. If you DIDN'T understand, go to a private message, and I'll explain it more specifically, although I'm not sure how much more specific I can be.