In my opinion, this implies that all bugs that are not permitted are prohibited. This aligns with the spirit of the rules, which are designed to make the game fair and equal. The list of prohibited bugs is informative and can be supplemented with new bugs, which will be done.
Anticipating a question about the interpretation of the supremacy of any of the rules (points), I will say that there is no need to engage in demagoguery about this; it is an endless question, and it will not be possible to find a consensus in it. All such controversial issues are resolved in the Arbitration Committee, which was done promptly.
Well, in that case, it would be good to adjust the rules because you end up with the comments on the rules being more important than the rules themselves. The rules state the prohibited bugs, as well as "what is not prohibited is permitted," while the permitted ones are only mentioned in the comments.
And what about the fair play rule? Was it violated or not?