Forum

Don't jump to conclusions; there aren't even ten of them. By the way, I happily make a note of everyone who shows a rejection of common sense and logic.

Everyone has their own idea of common sense, which is why we use rules and regulations to ensure everyone is on a level playing field and can compare their understanding of common sense with the general requirements for all. No one seems to be arguing that this is a bug and that it should be banned. The question is: why is a replay being ordered based on rules that were changed after the game was played? And the position of the Arbitration Committee (AK) remains unclear: did Redwhite violate the rules of fair play? And if so, should we understand that in the future, if someone violates the rules of fair play, the sanction for this will be the appointment of a replay? There must be some consistency in decisions.

Remembering the match between Lizard and Toganash, where in a completely won game for Lizard, due to nitpicking in the rules in a situation that had absolutely no impact on anything: after an arrow failed to take effect due to resistance and a bribe, the decision to order a replay was made on unclear grounds... It's becoming especially funny.

In a similar situation in the match between YaR and Chemist_HP in OFB-8, when the rules were violated but did not affect the outcome, the violator was acquitted.