Forum

As I understand it, Nitro asked AK: "Did Redwhite violate the rules of fair play, and if so, will any sanctions be applied to him?" There are no complaints against Nitro in this regard because he did not directly call for a replay but asked a perfectly reasonable question. If AK made a decision to replay, which essentially constitutes these sanctions against Redwhite, then it means he violated the rules of the game established by AK itself. However, as we can see in practice, Redwhite did not violate the rules of the game in effect at that time, and the "common sense" that AK used is devoid of common sense?!

What was all this demagoguery for? Either AK should give a "black mark" and ban the player for violating the rules, or (if the rules were not violated after all) no action should be taken regarding the already completed game, as this game was won FAIRLY and according to all the rules written by AK. There can be no talk of a technical victory here!

The right to edit the rules for subsequent games, of course(!), remains with AK, and no one is arguing with that.

P.S. I just want to understand this situation!