Forum

The counter-question is: what was Comrade Evgeny thinking about at that moment? Did he want to put on a show? - He succeeded. At the same time, he violated the rules of fair play.
In any society, there are unwritten rules (moral norms) that it is desirable to adhere to. And if a person violates these norms without breaking the law, it does not mean that he is acting correctly and that he will not face retribution. Now, let's project this onto our situation.
Comrade Evgeny CONSCIOUSLY violated certain moral norms, and instead of punishment, he receives a win. And all this is only because of a loophole in the law. Is it fair to deprive him of this win by rewriting the law? The question is rhetorical; everyone has the right to their personal opinion on this. But encouraging such actions is fraught with consequences. In the near future, other precedents will arise, and they will again point the finger at AK and accuse them of inconsistency.

Let's take it in order: This was a crucial game, and Redwhite was thinking about how to win. And he won without breaking any rules. This is about the legal aspect of the issue. As for the moral aspect, I believe that he played, as you put it, violating certain moral norms. Fine. So, let him decide for himself whether he wants to replay HIS FAIR VICTORY? There is also the point that winners are not judged, but it seems that this is not the case with us. (
p.s. In any civilized country in the world, there are places called courts. And people are judged there according to the laws of that country, but in every legal system, there are various loopholes in the laws that people like lawyers are not ashamed to use. Moreover, the better you know the laws and the loopholes in them, the better you are as a lawyer! If you can use the laws in a way that benefits you, no court can punish you. And your "retribution," to put it in comparison, is that you don't go to court as a civilized person to prove your case; it's like finding the offender in a dark alley and beating him with a bat. All this digression is to start understanding where you have legal norms, on which the system of rules and AK operates, and where you have moral norms - your personal attitude to this situation and your vision of "fair play." And to order a replay of a fairly won game, while changing the rules of the game in a specific situation to punish the player, is absurd and a farce on the part of AK.
In general, we are starting to engage in demagoguery; we need to wait for AK's explanation on this issue and try to find out the reasons for this action, rather than just chatting.