Forum

I don't want to repeat myself, but I guess I have to. There are rules that should govern these situations. If a situation isn't specified in the rules, it's allowed. Is that fair? Yes. Is there common sense in these words? Yes. The interesting question is: Did Redwait write these rules? No. Should Redwait follow the rules of the game? Yes. So why should comrade Evgeny be held responsible for the oversight of the guys who didn't think it was necessary to immediately include this bug in the rules of the game? This is a question I can't find an answer to, because it seems like he shouldn't be, but it also seems like the decision wasn't made in his favor.

p.s. Of course, you can't turn the game into a farce, but you definitely can't turn the rules, regulations, and everything else into a farce! Isn't that common sense?

A counter-question: what was comrade Evgeny thinking about at that moment? Did he want to put on a show? He succeeded. At the same time, he violated the rules of fair play.
In any society, there are unwritten rules (moral norms) that it is desirable to adhere to. And if a person violates these norms without breaking the law, it doesn't mean that he is acting normally and that he won't face consequences. Now let's project this onto our situation.
Comrade Evgeny CONSCIOUSLY violated certain moral norms, and instead of punishment, he gets a win. And all this is only because of a loophole in the law. Is it fair to deprive him of this win by rewriting the law? The question is rhetorical; everyone has the right to their own opinion on this. But encouraging such actions is fraught with consequences. In the near future, other precedents will arise, and they will again point the finger at AK and accuse him of inconsistency.