Forum

Yes, technically he didn't violate any rules, but in reality, he turned the game into a farce.

This kind of excessive exploitation should be prohibited at the rule level. That's all.

I don't want to repeat myself, but it seems I have to. There are rules that should regulate these moments. If a moment is not specified in the rules, it is allowed. Is this fair? Yes. Is there common sense in these words? Yes. The next interesting question is: Did Redwrite write these rules? No. Should Redwrite follow the rules of the game? Yes. Then why should comrade Evgeny be held responsible for the oversight of the people who didn't deem it necessary to immediately include this bug in the game rules? And that's a question I can't find an answer to, because it seems like he shouldn't be, but it also seems like the decision was made against him.

p.s. Of course, you can't turn the game into a farce, but you definitely shouldn't turn the rules, regulations, and everything else into a farce! And isn't that common sense?