MedjersoN_HP
Auto-translated
Another example. Let's say there's NATO.
Suddenly, out of nowhere, another UN appears, claiming, "This UN is not the real one; ours is the real one!"
...
- It pursues similar goals.
...
In this case, with both organizations being identical, one will always be considered illegitimate (it's like having two different governments in one country).
But take the Security Council, for example. The goal? Peace throughout the world, so that no human blood is spilled, whether at the hands of terrorists or anyone else.
Another organization appears with exactly the same goal. Is that bad? The first one will be against it, won't recognize it, saying, "Only we are the true fighters for peace?"
Therefore, I allow for the existence of a similar organization. But this is all in an ideal scenario. In reality, ASC doesn't seem to be about peace, but rather against Kittypink.
If everyone, even enemies, could come together and prevent war, that would be great.
It seems that neither of our "security councils" is thinking about peace. :D
В тихой однообразной жизни всегда так бывает: каждый отдельный день бесконечно долог, но месяцы и годы мчатся с непостижимой быстротой.
I wanted to offer you some flowers, but a crown would suit a princess like you much better
Смысл жизни в том, что жизнь на тебе не заканчивается
