Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Implying that the ban isn't a radical option in itself.
It isn't. So, what is a radical option then? Very radical? lol
Then why create nations in Heroes of Might and Magic, instead of just imagining what's what and writing a description?
Clearly not to take all the numbers into account and forbid players from role-playing. Besides, various factors influence the numbers, and therefore they limit role-playing options. Take my example again. If I'm strict, does that mean I have to fight everyone and behave like a cat? lol. You could even suggest taking into account those absurd inscriptions that appear after an issue is accepted. In general, this question could have been discussed in advance, or only the numbers should be taken into account, or the choice in the issue should be recorded, but in reality, it turns out that this is done selectively and not always in favor of the player.