Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
This is utter nonsense. It's complete idiocy to "improve the usability of naval units" in this way at the rules level. This is a BUG!! And bugs should be treated accordingly.
I believe that Red did not violate the rules, as it was not prohibited, and as everyone knows, what is not prohibited is allowed. And there's no need to appeal to conscience or anything like that; if it's not prohibited, it can be used.
The real question is, why wasn't this banned? (or unbanned?) I'm trying my best to understand, but I just can't!
All your face upgrades in Conflux, hit and wound, Red Rush, and even diplomacy and the Cloak of the Necromancer King – all pale in comparison to this blatant bug!
Or are we concerned about the "original spirit of the game"? Banning naval units in the text file on maps without water is something we simply can't do. It's not cool, it would impoverish the gameplay. But using such a malicious bug is perfectly normal!. It's in the spirit of the game, "well, it doesn't happen often. Why not, let's increase its usefulness."
facepalm.
But, for example, digging for the Grail from day one is a big no-no, it's overpowered.
In short, I have no words left besides profanities. Complete idiocy!
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/ За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того