Try reading it, I couldn't, although I rarely abandon what I've started. And isn't "The Wanderings of the Mage" part of some series, at least in the sense that the Necromancer Fess is there?
I've never seen bison, but I've read a lot about them, and I'll be hunting them. Something like that?
You used the word "dispute," not "competition." This is called misinformation, or simply, babble. It's interesting how this competition looked, and who participated in it.
If you're interested, read it in full; the 3rd post convincingly proves that this is not empty babble, but a discussion with a hint of objectivity.
There are several things that I really understand. Logic is one of them. So, there's very little logic in Nienna's work. And if you haven't noticed this, then you're either not very demanding, or you're not friends with logic at all.
I'll also answer about the rhetorical devices. This style of writing is over 500 years old; it developed in women's novels back in the Renaissance era and has never been an example of beautiful language, because it lacks naturalness and aesthetics. It's just the absence of deep meaning draped in the pomp of phrases.
The pomp of phrases – well, yes, I like beautiful expressions.
I remind you once again that I am not a big fan of Nienna and Perumov, and I suggest ending the discussion, because the interesting arguments have been exhausted, and it's just nitpicking.