Skip to content
User Avatar
#2101
Auto-translated
I don't really want to choose the first option, even though it promises a good economy. The second option is probably not bad from an ecological point of view, but it might weaken the economy.
The third option seems good, but not for the environment. If it significantly damages the environment, it might slightly spoil the image of the country that I had in mind.
I chose the third option.
Environmental Beauty decreased by 19 something, and toxicity increased by 12 something. But tourism increased by 5 something, employment by 8, and public transport by 8.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: nebov24@gmail.com