Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The clues shouldn't be based on a specific profile, but rather on a set of concepts – that's good. I'll continue using this approach. Perhaps it would be beneficial to filter the list more carefully. Maybe we should follow Heroist's advice and provide short summaries instead of links to the Wiki. (c)
Kosh, in general, I found that these types of clues were the most interesting. At first, linking to the Wiki is fine, but once everyone gets used to it, we can move on. That is, we shouldn't limit ourselves to just the Wiki when hiding the solution, but the information should still be reliable.
Added 1 minute ago Heroist
The same problem.
Well, let's just say, I've already mentioned that they are several times larger, which means that instead of a logical chain, you just have to search for the right word in a huge amount of text from Wikipedia. And I'm not against some short questionnaires that don't need to be filled out manually.
But what prevents us from creating a hint with a logical chain using the same Wiki? For example, "an elderly ruler" (quite simple) for the Master level.
mika
