The Lord of the Rings

In the movie, Aragorn is quite normal in terms of his physical build. It was only mentioned that he was taller than Boromir, but broader in the shoulders. What he lacks is age. In the book, his hair was half-gray, and his face was very stern and... I don't want to use this word about Aragorn, but weathered. Despite this, he turned out very well in the movie! Actually, I would only criticize the movie for a few things: - They removed Bombadil and the Barrow-downs. I understand that it was impossible to include them due to time constraints, but it's still a pity. - Arwen instead of Glorfindel, and she also pointed a sword at Aragorn's throat and drove away the Black Riders single-handedly :vomiting smiley: - Aragorn being killed and then resurrected by Arwen. It's just awful! - Gimli standing on Balin's grave (in the book, he cut off the legs of the orc who dared to do that). - A troll, not an orc, stabbed Frodo with a spear. Chainmail is a flexible thing. Frodo should have been flattened. - Legolas in battle! I haven't seen anything more disgusting. He's some kind of invulnerable arrow-shooting machine. He completely ruined half of the impression of the battles:mad: - Galadriel didn't turn out well, and that's it. Only Elrond is worse. - Aragorn was given a sword only in the third part. - The ghosts, instead of gladly joining Aragorn and being freed, wanted to kill him. I was confused:confused: - In the book, the evil will of the mountain itself prevented the Fellowship from crossing Caradhras. In the movie, it was Saruman for some reason. - The king of Rohan, for some reason, didn't listen to Gandalf and stubbornly followed his own line. - They besieged Helm's Deep with only Uruk-hai, although in the book there were many different creatures there, up to werewolves. However, overall, the movie is brilliant! I expected much worse...