Silvanis
Auto-translated
Judaism, by its very nature, cannot be aggressive in terms of proselytization. Figure it out for yourself why:)
Although, of course, this does not prevent it from being aggressive in its essence.
Islam, from the very beginning, for some reason assumed that this absurd and theologically impoverished copy of Christianity/Judaism would be able to assimilate three religions; naturally (to our great happiness), this did not happen. For some time, Muslims treated Christians and Jews with respect, calling them "People of the Book," but around the 10th century, this respect disappeared, and saying that you, for example, are a Christian among these "peaceful" followers of the "peaceful" (who only destroyed Mecca, not listening to his sermons) Prophet Muhammad, was perhaps even more dangerous than saying in London that you are a Muslim. Now, of course, respect is being restored - religion has always been driven by the needs of practice...
I would also like to add that if many peoples converted to Christianity on their own (the Roman Empire, Ireland, Scandinavia, the barbarian kingdoms that arose on the ruins of the Roman Empire, Ethiopia, and many others - this is if we consider only the conversions that occurred in the New Age to be violent), even the Khazar Khaganate converted to Judaism voluntarily, then only some Arab tribes voluntarily converted to Islam, and then they spread their faith throughout the Middle East with fire and sword, causing such destruction and inflicting so much damage to the ancient heritage in these places that it is impossible to say with certainty whether their scientific and cultural flourishing in the 10th-14th centuries made up for this devastation...
Although, of course, this does not prevent it from being aggressive in its essence.
Islam, from the very beginning, for some reason assumed that this absurd and theologically impoverished copy of Christianity/Judaism would be able to assimilate three religions; naturally (to our great happiness), this did not happen. For some time, Muslims treated Christians and Jews with respect, calling them "People of the Book," but around the 10th century, this respect disappeared, and saying that you, for example, are a Christian among these "peaceful" followers of the "peaceful" (who only destroyed Mecca, not listening to his sermons) Prophet Muhammad, was perhaps even more dangerous than saying in London that you are a Muslim. Now, of course, respect is being restored - religion has always been driven by the needs of practice...
I would also like to add that if many peoples converted to Christianity on their own (the Roman Empire, Ireland, Scandinavia, the barbarian kingdoms that arose on the ruins of the Roman Empire, Ethiopia, and many others - this is if we consider only the conversions that occurred in the New Age to be violent), even the Khazar Khaganate converted to Judaism voluntarily, then only some Arab tribes voluntarily converted to Islam, and then they spread their faith throughout the Middle East with fire and sword, causing such destruction and inflicting so much damage to the ancient heritage in these places that it is impossible to say with certainty whether their scientific and cultural flourishing in the 10th-14th centuries made up for this devastation...
С Пути сбивают мелкие достижения, а изощрённые суждения скрывают смысл слов. И вот уже возникают "правильное" и "неправильное"...
- Чжуан-цзы
Сильванис
- Чжуан-цзы
Сильванис