One for all and all for one - 3

Identity won 1 game, and his so-called weakness, which we are talking about, is largely due to the fact that there are strong participants from the 2nd seed in group A. The option of a replacement is related to the fact that there was a post about technical issues after the 18th, and Identity does not respond to messages on ICQ. I also believe that Identity has the right to continue playing, but I want to hear a decision on how we proceed in this case (there are unfinished matches not only in our group). It is far from certain that we will win all the remaining matches, that's one. Being eliminated from the tournament due to technical issues is unpleasant, that's two. The option proposed by Palach seems optimal in this case, namely - a draw with empty slots, that's three. Extending the group stage by a week with odd-even assignments, that's four. And, if possible, the organizers should compile a list of participants for replacements, to avoid such situations, that's five. And I am also waiting for Roger's decision.