That's how he did it. Initially, there were no restrictions at all.;)
There were no questions about the profile. There were no questions about the side (you are Mafia, you are Town, you are a neutral), and also no questions about the role. So what's the problem? If such a restriction is too weak (and I don't think it is, since it didn't clearly define the role for any of those questioned), then this should have been discussed before the game. In any case, in the previous game, you had more reason to pin that medal on the Master. Because "you are Mafia" and "you are on the side of the Mafia leader" are essentially the same thing. So why didn't you criticize that then? By the way, I think I was the only one who remembered those questions and that's why I paid attention to the journalist. Apparently, because I was the only one who became a victim of that journalistic arbitrariness.:D
As long as you ignore common sense, the conversation is pointless