Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The Shaman assured me that he would limit the journalist's questioning.
And that's how he did it. Initially, there were no restrictions at all.;)
No more than one question about the profile's content, no more than two questions about specific roles (image and description), and no more than two questions about the faction.
There were no questions about the profile at all. There weren't three questions about the faction (are you Mafia, are you Town, are you a Maniac), and the same goes for the roles. So, what's the problem? If such a restriction is too weak (and I don't think it is, as it didn't clearly identify anyone's role), then that should have been discussed before the game. In any case, in the previous game, you had more reason to pin that medal on the Master. Because "you are Mafia" and "you are on the side of the Mafia leader" are essentially the same thing. So why didn't you criticize it then? By the way, I think I was the only one who remembered those questions and that's why I paid attention to the journalist. Apparently, because I was the only one who fell victim to that journalistic arbitrariness.:D
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).