Be more specific, please, and in a softer, more readable form.
I'm asking.
The question about the side
The question about the description of a specific role. What are the complaints?
Well, this is just nitpicking about everything and anything, just to keep the Somafa from being killed. Learn how to lose.
The kill isn't shown either if the target is in SH, or if there is a block. Which is more likely? A block.
But it seems that before all the above, the ND was successful.
And that's good. Imagine if all games followed a template. Anyway, there was plenty of time to discuss everything; you decided to start doing this in the middle of the game, when everyone had already decided and voiced their dissatisfaction, and the Shaman fixed them.
It seems to me that anyone would be offended, at the very least, by such blistering criticism, full of grammatical errors and aggression. By the way, what insult was there, can't you remind me? Or even better, send it. Or is it obscene? :)
2) demagoguery = a wonderful game: are you a snowman? (question about role)
are you made of several snowballs stacked on top of each other? (question about shape)
do you appear during the cold season? (question about time)
if you weren't taught to distinguish between form and content in philosophy classes, then that is a problem with YOUR education
3) you should have seen how many times the course of the game changed because of a violation of the correct execution format... this is a TRIAL, not a murder. Everything must be according to protocol. I didn't object when the Shaman told us that Alex wouldn't be online and was passing his vote to the Witch (although in all games, the votes of offliners are not counted; I myself lost twice as a maf because my partner didn't manage to get online and cast their vote)
4) the mafchat - in its entirety! since on this forum I can be called whatever you want without consequences, while any word of mine immediately goes into the protocol and there is a total lack of reaction to apologies offered
Added after 14 minutes
1. Quote:
Message from oven666
1) when turn after turn the GM violates the rules they invented themselves and justifies it by saying "it just happened." Moreover, the biases are made ONLY in favor of the town (giving a reciprocal break to the mafs is FORBIDDEN because it's UNFAIR!
2.
Quote:
Message from oven666
I hope that all GMs will draw at least one conclusion from my game: once the game has started, only NDs and some questions (not all!!!) are accepted from the players. Any demands, requests, advice, and recommendations should not be considered, and it's better to punish them immediately with a modkill. Otherwise, regardless of the percentage of fulfilled requests and demands, the players will be dissatisfied. And if you obediently fulfill EVERYTHING that is "recommended" to you, then it's no longer your game
2.
You need to decide, first or second.
Option 2 - the GM takes full responsibility and runs the game trying to fix the blunders, and at the end honestly says: "here and here I messed up - here I got confused, here I made a mistake"
but here I see a joyful choir: "Magnificent game!, Wonderful GM! Great players!" "Why does the rooster praise the rooster without fear of sin? Because he praises the cuckoo"
Added after 1 minute
Wishing you a speedy recovery!