Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I looked at the subject of the dispute in terms of the voting method: single choice versus multiple choice, and it gave me the impression of a logical mess. In the stated contest, when the nominations "Best map/campaign" are announced, only a single choice is possible. *Dyrman's* proposal for multiple choices leads to determining the best mapmaker. There is no such nomination, although the contest itself is called "Mapmaster 2014" (implying a person). Perhaps, it is necessary to either add a nomination or change the name of the contest. The first option seems better to me. The number of contenders (people) is not so small, more than ten (according to *Heroist's* list). Just as the Oscar for "best film" does not cancel the Oscar for best directing or acting, the "Mapmaster" nomination does not conflict with prizes for the best maps in the genre. But, if it comes to creating a new nomination, the voting should be done individually from the list.