Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
But why wouldn't a peaceful Ment-Priest (Warlord) answer yes-yes-no? With such answers, he wouldn't have any mafia roles-candidates. It's all so strange...
Added 1 minute ago Oven, read the order of Night Actions. The Bard could have easily blocked Alex and gone to the swamp.
Lizard and Sesam, are you trying to say that an unsuccessful block equals a successful block? What is an unsuccessful block then? Is it when the blocker dies on the way? Probably from laughing! Read carefully!!!
16. Hypnosis of the Firefly. (Displayed in case of success)
We know that the Bard performed a successful Night Action - he prevented the witch's apprentice, who was given a speed boost with tea, from conducting two investigations... We know that the Firefly performed a successful Night Action against Kosha - he lured her to the swamp and kept her there. We know that the Werewolf performed his Night Action, and only the Knight's protection stopped it, not a block. All three mafia members made their moves, and no one stopped them, and you continue to insist that Kosha, who was blocked by the Firefly, is a mafia member? Read the newspaper again. The Bard performed his action, the Werewolf performed his, and the Firefly performed his, and the Firefly's action is only reflected in the newspaper if it was successful!!! If he successfully blocked Kosha, and the Bard blocked Alex, then how can the Bard be Kosha? Explain? If you believe that the entries in the newspaper should be interpreted contrary to logic, like this: "If a blocker comes to block a blocker who has already performed his block this night, the second blocker's block should be considered successful (despite its meaninglessness)," then we can develop this thought: if a killer comes to kill a person who was killed in the same night by another killer, then this kill (of a corpse) should also be considered successful (and leave clues!) :smile09: In short, if before I thought the Hero was a mafia member (based on the first investigation, 1/3), and the Snowman (based on his behavior), now I am increasingly convinced of the Hero's innocence and of the Ment's mafia membership (who some are so actively defending) and of one of you:smile48: I just don't understand yet who of you is a mafia member and who is just a little bit slow.
Added 1 minute ago 0xFF
Can someone explain why the Shaman revealed the ROLE of the attacked person to the mafia, and how the Warlord is involved in the attack, who, according to the beginning of the description, used his Night Action on himself?