K0Lb@zzeR
Auto-translated
I assume that K0Lb@zzeR is also pursuing the following idea:
The thing is, it's not always possible to determine the "minimum" for a map right away, or at all (optimal Walkthrough).
And judging by what K0Lb@zzeR suggests...
No, I'm not trying to resubmit saves a second time. I'm pursuing the idea of replaying a map based on preliminary results, but only for personal use... and doing all of this during the tournament, because after it's over, the enthusiasm is not the same... and it actually fades as the tournament progresses and the results are summarized.
Added 12 minutes later
The idea itself is interesting in principle, but only if you can send an unlimited number of saves... but if this rule is introduced, you can imagine how much the workload on the host will increase... I don't think any host would agree to that...
Sincerely.
Although, I've been thinking... in principle, you could allow sending a save a second time, but in exchange for the player using the second attempt (they get two in total), they have to sacrifice something... namely, they can't take the top five places, i.e., even if their result is good enough for first place, they are only awarded sixth place... and their General rating is calculated as 120% of the average result for the two attempts.
As a result, this system will allow underdogs to rise in the General ranking... but it won't let them win the tournament.
