Forum

Two different sources are used: Russian and Ukrainian, and they are studied. This allows you to see where and what is wrong. And if you share information with someone, it should be in the form of facts, not assertions.

Ah, if only this policy and this malevolent romantic didn't exist.

Look, if we follow your suggestion, we will come to points of disagreement. In other words, we will bring order to the chaos of assertions.
BUT!!! Damn it, if that's the case, there won't be any wars, because everything is clear, understandable, and organized. Everyone is happy.
No!!! This scenario does not suit those who stirred up this mess.
Otherwise, they would have long ago established the facts: Is there a Russian army in Ukraine, who shot down the Boeing, who was behind the snipers on Maidan, was there an armed coup or a revolution in Kyiv, etc., etc.
No, everything is going in the opposite direction, towards chaos and misunderstanding. Because only in such conditions can you "stir up the mess."
And this "mess" is already being "cooked up." Therefore, you will not be able to find answers to the simplest questions.

Here is a seemingly simple question: is there a Russian army in Ukraine? - Isn't it easy to provide facts confirming or refuting this statement? It doesn't seem to be like finding a needle in a haystack, yet so far there are only unsubstantiated claims. -> This is the path to chaos!!!

The path of facts is the path to order.